Petition Tag - affirmative action

The recently tabled draft legislation by the Minister of Labour will discriminate against people in South Africa classified under apartheid laws as Coloured, White and Indian in the sense that Equity in the workplace and affirmative action measures will legally compell employers to show preference to Black people over the rest taking into account National and not Provincial demographics.

The New South Africa should move beyond Race in measuring peoples worth if we are to be achieve a free and non racial society.

View petition

HARD COPY OF THIS EXACT TEXT CAN BE FOUND AT www.kaURna.webs.com I encourage all Australian residents to download the PDF hardcopy, collect a few signatures (no address needed) and return as per the PDF. There is NO citizenship requirements to sign the hardcopy or electronic petition, however Australia's Parliament won't accept the electronic format, only hardcopy.

Point ONE(1):
The intent to to stop enforced segregation of harms which could take a victim their entire adult life or well over 30 years to progress through the civil courts or otherwise logistically impossible for one person to deal with.
Stalking and assault and torture and surgery without legal authority are all unlawful in Australia, they all carry the potential of lengthy penal sentencing under criminal law, however Australian legislation has one huge loophole that forces a victim of these crimes to prosecute each single incident separately under civil or common law (state) or human rights treaties (federal or High court). That is if you are stalked by say 20 persons and police refuse to investigate each one and each of the 20 individuals assault you in separate incidents you have to prosecute each separately as unconnected events despite evidence that strongly suggests they are connected as one crime. Unlike the treatment of defamation, there is no allowance to deem multiple assaults as one stalking event that generates many incidents.

Point TWO (2):
The intent is to remove the expectation that only an "expert" is be legally entitled to define the existence of a foreign item a radiology film. Presently you must have a signed letter from a medical practitioner to say you have a hatchet poking out of your head if you want it removed, that is to say in the event that you do have a hatchet poking out of your head which you also want removed.

Point THREE(3):
Jane is being stalked by many persons, most are strangers to her or persons she knows but is unaware they are the stalkers. The stalkers have caused Jane to be considerably surgically raped the evidence is in radiology diagnostic film funded by Medicare Australia between 2005 and 2010 inclusive. The film has been falsely interpreted on paper omitting to describe foreign items inside Jane that are very clearly seen in the film. The stalkers have falsely defamed Jane. The question of did the surgical rape of defamation come first is insignificant in the presence of the fact that both are considerably criminal, more so if there was premeditation and where both exist concurrently and begun around the same period of time then clearly there was premeditation.

Point FOUR(4):
The "choice" to investigate or not investigate a crime is removed as an option for a law enforcement official. That Federal police refuse to investigate these crimes against the Commonwealth of Australia then there is clear evidence that police are amongst the stalkers. Police should seen in legislation in a different light from the rest of us insomuch as they should have less room for error as they have more trust. Police should never be allowed to refuse to investigate any crime. It should not be up to police to choose what crime they want to investigate because that leaves individual police department "law enforcement" "public officials" open to be contracted by any third party as tools of stalkers. Under the present system of Australia police governance career criminals must presently be employed as senior police and aspiring cadets and everywhere in-between. Law enforcement officers are not necessarily police officers.

Point FIVE(5):
No land-line telephone number should be allowed to be blocked - as a society of humans who are defined as the superior race on earth because we are able to speak then we MUST all have full confidence in the ability to identify a person we encounter through verbal communication. If someone wants to preserve their telephone privacy they can call on a public phone. In these days of technology awareness rampant identity theft and sophisticated electronic crimes and the expectation that all government public officials must be accountable under statute, public official anonymity is totally unacceptable.

In 2011 just about every commonwealth of Australia department land-line telephone has it's number blocked from the persons they are calling, they expect you to divulge personal information under these circumstances.

View petition

Legacy preferences in college admissions are detrimental to each and every student's opportunity for an equal education.

Legacy students are students that are admitted into a college or university that are a relative of an alumnus of said university. Legacy students make up 10-15% of most ivy league institutions, and 24% of Notre Dame students. Legacy students at the University of Virginia have a 4.3 times better chance of admission than normal applicants with the same scores. Thousands of students with perfect 2400 SAT scores were rejected from Yale, while legacy students were admitted at more than triple the rate of the normal applicant pool.

Legacy preference is an issue that is ruining America's equal opportunity education. How can we raise the bright, young students of America when there is no opportunity for those students, smart as they are, to attend a prestigious university?

Legacy preference is often times referred to as "affirmative action for the white." Is this the America that we were brought up to respect and love? The Constitution explicity states, "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States," and John Adams wrote in 1788 that, "Legal distinctions, titles, powers and privileges, are not hereditary.”

Now is the time to ban legacy injustices in college admissions.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/us/15bar.html
http://www.house.gov/house/Constitution/Constitution.html
http://www.reason.com/news/show/123910.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/education/04colleges.html

View petition

This petition serves as notice to The President of The Republic of South Africa that we the undersigned are hereby making a lawful application to have the Affirmative Action Policies of South Africa repealed.

Why we ask for mobile numbers is that it is a unique number that we can use to identify different people of the same name.

One Million names is a big database.

Thanks for signing !

View petition